Saturday, November 21, 2009

Student Lenders Rise On Hopes Fedl Loan Program Will Survive

Shares of student lenders jumped Wednesday after an analyst suggested that the industry may not immediately be pushed out of the federal loan origination business, a prospect many had feared for months.

"Although still an uphill battle, the survival of the FFELP program, we believe, is a real possibility," FBR Capital Markets analyst Matt Snowling wrote in a note to investors, referring to the Federal Family Education Loan Program, which allows private lenders to originate government-backed loans for college students. The Obama administration had proposed a plan to bypass the lenders in favor of direct lending, allowing the companies only to service the loans but not originate them.

According to Snowling, the health-care debate has delayed congressional action on the lending legislation. Because schools and students need clarity by the time the new lending season gets under way this winter, the government could be forced to reauthorize the current rules and try again for an overhaul next year. Snowling said legislation to extend the current law could be introduced in both houses as early as Wednesday.

If there is such a delay, Snowling said, a lender-backed alternative to Obama's proposal would look more attractive the next time the debate comes to a head.

A delay "gives Congress ample time to fully consider how best to reform the student loan program," said Martha Holler, a spokeswoman for SLM Corp. (SLM), the largest private originator of federal loans. SLM, commonly known as Sallie Mae, originated $6.9 billion of federal student loans in the third quarter of this year.

Shares of Sallie Mae were recently trading up 6.1% at $11.40. Nelnet Inc. (NNI), another major federal lender, rose 2.2% to $17.42. First Marblehead Corp. (FMD), which securitizes student loans, was trading up 4.8% at $2.20.

While stocks are responding positively to Snowling's note, the continuation of FFELP isn't a sure thing. The House of Representatives already passed a sweeping student loan reform bill in September approving many of the changes the Obama administration encouraged, and Snowling noted that the Senate is still three to five votes short of approving the lender-backed proposal were a vote to go forward.

The lenders' stocks were further buoyed because Sallie Mae sold $839 million in student loan-backed securities Tuesday on the open market, without the assistance of the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF). The sale was a sign that investors once again have a taste for the securities, as risk premiums, or spreads, have tightened enough to make the option affordable for Sallie Mae. The most recent deal sold at 75 basis points over one month London interbank offered rate, or Libor.

Sallie Mae's Holler said the deal was "perhaps the best-priced consolidation deal in some time."

Comments war: UC students and non-UC students discuss the student fee hike

It seems the recent decision by the University of California Board of Regents to increase student fees by 32% has caused not only a "students vs. regents" demonstration at UCLA's campus today, but also a "students vs. non-students" quarrel in our comments sections.

The fee hike that everyone is arguing about (justifiably so) will come in two steps by fall 2010. Basic UC education fees will rise then to about $10,300, plus another $1,000 for campus-based charges and an estimated additional $16,000 for room, board and books.

No wonder there is such a heated comments war in our blogs: With the raise, the cost of a UC education will be triple what it was a decade ago. Compared to other U.S. four-year public colleges, which have raised tuition and fees by an average 6.5% to $7,020 a year, a 32% fee hike is pretty notable.

On the L.A. Now blog, the battle rages on with two parties: non-UC students -- who seem to be a mixture of out-of-college adults, community college students and general California residents -- and current UC students. The former argue that current students are being unreasonably demanding.

Balancing the budget is never easy, is it?

Here is what the non-UC students have had to say so far:

Pablo defends his own interests against the fee hike protestors: Listen up, UC students. I'm about to lose my job and I'm close to losing my house. Do you want me to sell my 10-year old car so that I can pay for your incredibly cheap tuition?

He also said: Who taught these people that they were entitled to free (or unreasonably cheap) stuff in life?

Duken4evr believes UC students should explore other means available to pay for their education: They can always go to community college like the rest of us. Screw those spoiled brat UCLA students. Hit up your rich mommies and daddies for the difference. Cry me a river. What a bunch of useless losers.

SoCalReality presents a parent’s point of view: This state is bankrupt! Your FREE education ended at High School. You want to be treated like an adult, act like one and PAY YOUR OWN WAY. The UC system already subsidizes your education with fees below their cost. What you want is continuing "Student Welfare" on the backs of us Tax Payers; go to a cheaper collage or to a Cal State like my kids. But NO, you want caviar education paid by others. GROW UP!

And Reality takes a stand about the actual educational material: IF UC wants to save some money...get rid of the worthless soft-science degrees such as gender and ethnic studies and make those profesors get real jobs instead of pusing their anti-American rants on the tax payer dime!

Then UC students took a stand (after the jump):

UCLA STUDENT expressed his/her point of view: As a UCLA student, in the thick of things, getting a student job, student loans and summer jobs are not enough. The student jobs that everyone suggests we get are not available, there are fewer of them, and they are limiting the amount of hours we can work each week. Many of these jobs are also at minimum wage. Furthermore, do you not think we already have student loans and summer jobs? We are already struggling to make ends meet, and for many, these fee increases are going to break our backs. The protests, however, are not just about the fee increases, it is also the devaluing of our degrees. In an effort to save money, they have fired all the "lecturers" at UCLA. They are also trying to decrease the number of classes we need to get our degrees. This means we are putting out less qualified less informed students. At this rate, not only will we be paying more, we'll be paying more for less. Before you ask us to stop whining, consider the reality of our situation.

Concerned Gaucho talked about the reality of the hikes for low-income students: I am a current UCSB student and the fee hike is going to seriously hurt my chances of remaining here. As a low-income student, I do not have the ability to ask Mommy and Daddy for money. I pray that the state will somehow compensate some federal funding because a shift to private assistance will hurt the "public" school system.

And the kiss of death, at least to any UCLA Bruin or anyone who can't afford a private school, is what John had to say: After these fees hike, it might be cheaper to go to USC than UCLA. USC at least gives plenty of financial aid.

How do you feel about all of this? Should UC students be able to pick themselves up by their own bootstraps and shoulder these fee hikes with financial aid (with the University of California's plans to increase financial aid opportunities) or extra jobs? Or are there more serious implications from the increases, which may force students to take out private loans or even drop out of the UC system? Tell us below.

-- Kelsey Ramos

Ford's Non-TALF $1.027 Billion Deal Backed By Auto Loans

By Anusha Shrivastava

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Ford Motor Co. (F) is in the market with a $1.027 billion deal, backed by auto loans.

The deal, called FORDO 09-E, is not eligible for financing under a Federal Reserve program that offers investors cheap loans to buy newly created consumer loan-backed deals.

Ford's deal is expected to price on Wednesday. Joint leads are Barclays Capital, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley.

The deal has four tranches, of which three are rated triple-A.

The Fed has supported the securitization market through its Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF, launched in March. Total issuance this year stands at $131.41 billion, according to a note from Deutsche Bank. Of this, more than $90 billion has been eligible for TALF funds.

Ford was one of four issuers who sold TALF-eligible deals in March, when the program was first launched. In June and July, it sold a total of three auto loan-backed deals that were all TALF-eligible. It returned to the market again in September, selling a $2.074 billion auto loan-backed deal that was also eligible for TALF.

Most recently, in October, Ford sold a $1.5 billion dealer floorplan-backed deal that was eligible for TALF.

Auto loan-backed deals comprise the bulk of issuance so far this year at $ 55.41 billion, or 42.2%, the Deutsche Bank note says. Credit card loan-backed deals are at $41.56 billion, or 31.6% of total issuance. Student loan-backed deals are a distant third at $15.85 billion, or 12.1%.

-By Anusha Shrivastava, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-416-2227; anusha.shrivastava@ dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires
11-16-09 1312ET
Copyright (c) 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

blogger templates | Make Money Online